The court, in a judgement that was delivered by Justice Zainab Abubakar, equally directed the security agency to tender a written apology to Opara and also publish the same on a national daily.
The judgement followed a fundamental right enforcement suit the lawyer filed to protest the alleged degrading treatment he was subjected to when he paid a visit to the IPOB leader at the DSS detention facility in Abuja.
Opara, told the court that the DSS had on August 30, 2021, when he paid a routine visit to Kanu, commandeered him to a particular room within its facility for purposes of alleged bodily search, “wherein they forced him to remove his medicated eye-glasses, wedding ring, belt, jacket and shoes and accordingly left him shabbily dressed.”
Opara maintained that the action the DSS took against him, amounted to a gross violation of his right to dignity of the human person as guaranteed under Sections 34 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended), as well as Article 5 of the African Charter on Human and People Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act Cap A9 Vol. 1 LFN.
Opara, prayed the court to award him N50 million as compensation for the infringement of his fundamental rights to dignity and the human person.
Cited as respondents in the suit marked, FHC/ABJ/CS/1018/2021, were the DSS and its Director-General.
Meanwhile, the DSS, in a counter-affidavit that was deposed to by one of its personnel, Ahmed Magaji, told the court that depositions in Opara’s affidavit were untrue and that the DSS simply conducted routine security checks on the day Opara visited Kanu.
“That in carrying out these onerous duties, the Respondents emplaced various measures aimed at screening all visitors before gaining access into the facility of the Respondents on invitation or for official purposes.
“That the Respondents carry out security screening of all visitors through a scanning machine to avoid breach of security and to detect harmful or dangerous objects gaining entry into the Respondents’ facility.
“That contrary to paragraph 19 of the Applicant’s deposition, the Applicant only underwent the usual security search as applicable to visitors from taking harmful or dangerous items into the Respondent facility.
“That contrary to the Applicant’s deposition that he moved around barefooted, the Respondent only carry out security search and Covid-19 safety measures on all visitors and the Applicant inclusive which does not in any way include walking on barefoot, removal of the belt, etc, as claimed by the Applicant.”
In her judgement on Monday, Justice Abubakar granted all the reliefs the Applicant sought in the suit, though she reduced the damages from N50 million to N5 million.